Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1365

reference
22-tree-1
name
1365
tree-preservation-order

undefined

22-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.967455 50.854660)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.967398 50.854654,-0.967401 50.854665,-0.967409 50.854675,-0.967421 50.854683,-0.967437 50.854688,-0.967454 50.854690,-0.967472 50.854689,-0.967488 50.854684,-0.967500 50.854676,-0.967509 50.854666,-0.967512 50.854655,-0.967509 50.854644,-0.967501 50.854634,-0.967489 50.854626,-0.967473 50.854620,-0.967456 50.854618,-0.967438 50.854620,-0.967422 50.854625,-0.967409 50.854633,-0.967401 50.854643,-0.967398 50.854654)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL